You can see a full schedule of the day right here
Save Earl's Court campaign will stage their I Love Earl's Court Day on Saturday, 26th October 2013 - events all day!
Whitesnake are currently on their world tour with stadium appearances across the US and Latin America. Legendary lead singer/songwriter David Coverdale took time out though to tweet his support for the Save Earl's Court campaign and to swap pics with artist Duggie Fields.
Many thanks to the 6,000 people that signed the Save Earl’s Court Petition, which was handed into the Department for Communities and Local Government this week. The next stage is that the petition goes to Birmingham for the preparation of a report to Edward Lister, and the decision to have a Public Enquiry will be known in early September.
The London Film and Comic Convention 7th July 2013 held at Earl's Court Two was an opportunity for us to meet film, sci-fi and comic book fans who signed our petition in support of saving Earl's Court from demolition.
Black Butler Fans who signed our petition
Collosus from X-Men at Earl's Court 1 doing a recce for its defence
Fallout 3 Vault Dwellers show their support for the Save Earl's Court campaign today
Naruto Fans in support of saving Earl's Court 1 and 2
Queues round the block to get into Earl's Court 2 for Film and Comic Convention 2013
Solidarity from Argentinian Queen Fan today at Earl's Court 1
Swedish Trekkies in support of Save Earl's Court campaign
Marc Almond the well known English singer-songwriter and musician has lent his support to our campaign to SAVE EARLS COURT.
He has lived in London for over 30 years and in an interview in 2010 he said; "The London I love seems to be disappearing every day. For all its faults, it is the greatest city.
Duggie Fields tweeted the back of the Boris Johnson postcard yesterday (which talks about the centres, the depot and housing estates) to singer Marc Almond. and he has kindly retweeted it . https://twitter.com/MarcAlmond
5 MARCH 2013
Darren Johnson AM urges Mayor of London to refuse Earl’s Court planning application
London Assembly Member Darren Johnson AM has written to Boris Johnson(1) urging him to direct refusal to the Earl’s Court redevelopment proposals granted planning permission by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The planning application is due to be referred to the Mayor of London for a decision.
Darren Johnson said:
“The Earls Court demolition plans are a recipe for a disaster, with massive economic, social and environmental consequences. The winners will be the wealthy developers and overseas property speculators while the losers will be the community, local businesses and Londoners who will lose one of the capital’s key exhibition centres.”
Summary of Darren Johnson’s objections:
1) Content of Darren Johnson’s letter to Boris Johnson dated 8th February 2013 copied below:
Mayor of London
Redevelopment plans for Earls Court Site – Earl’s Court Exhibition Centre, Lillie Bridge Rail Depot and West Kensington and Gibbs Green Housing Estates
Kensington & Chelsea ref: PP/11/01937 & Hammersmith & Fulham ref:2011/02001/OUT
Earl’s Court is a hugely important, successful and established international exhibition venue that brings in two and a half million visitors, thirty thousand exhibitors, hundreds of events and over a billion pounds a year to London. Benefiting from a central London location, close to the West End and convenient for Heathrow it attracts business from all over the globe and plays a key role in the growth of the expanding exhibition and events industry and our export economy. Its strong identity, distinctive townscape, a range of heritage assets and good transport links also draws in significant trade and revenue into the local area.
I strongly object to the redevelopment proposals granted planning permission by the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea and firmly believe that if the proposal goes ahead it will:
The demolition of this important national icon will be detrimental to the local and wider economy and contrary to the London Plan, Policy 4.1d which supports and promotes the distinctive and crucial contribution to London’s economic success made by central London and its specialist clusters of economic activity. As well as contrary to London Plan, Policy 4.5 which supports London’s visitor infrastructure.
The loss of a national institution which hosts top events, exhibitions and major concerts is contrary to London Plan, Policy 4.6 which supports culture, art and entertainment.
The Exhibition Centres plays a key role in delivering the events economy, which at a time of economic recession has expanded by over 18% from £9.3billion to £11billion a year. Its loss would relegate the UK’s position as a world leader in the exhibition and events industry as competitor nations are subsidising, not removing venues equivalent in location and status to Earl’s Court. The Association of Event Organisers (AEO) report that London is already short of exhibition space for national and international events and the UK is losing revenue and trade to other countries.
This will also remove one of the main exhibition venues in the capital that are suitable for mid-range consumer events that showcase UK businesses and trades. Olympia is not large enough despite its recent upgrade and tubes only service the station from 10.00am on the days that exhibitions are running. According AEO East London’s Excel is not suitable for most of the Earl’s Court shows and cite examples such as the Boat Show that transferred to Excel and lost visitors. Others were forced, by popular demand to return to Earls Court.
Local businesses will be affected by the loss of exhibitors and the two and a half million visitors to the Exhibition Centre. Without any substantial replacement retail, leisure and other amenities existing businesses will close down without the flow of Exhibition Centre visitors.
This will undermine the Mayor’s economic development policies of promoting London as the world capital for business, as the world’s top international visitor destination, and a competitive business environment. Paragraph 4.9 in Mayor’s London Plan.
The closure of the Lillie Bridge Depot, which employs upto 550 people and manufactures track components bespoke to London Underground (as well as components to Network Rail and other railways), will not only lead to the loss of a skilled workforce and employment, but the loss of a cost effective resource that meets London Underground’s unique requirements.
Lack of affordable Housing
An unacceptable low provision of affordable homes and contrary to London Plan, Policy 3.8 on housing choice and access to genuine affordable housing.
Of the total number of 5,845 residential units proposed, 760 will be provided for the re-provision of the decanted residents of the West Kensington and Gibbs Estate (comprising 531 social rent homes, 58 Registered Social Landlord owned properties; and 171 privately owned market homes). Although the re-provision units are termed ‘affordable’ there are no guarantees that the existing 531 social rent homes will be replaced with equivalent tenures. Compulsory Purchase ordered private home owners may not be able to take up replacement offers due to substantially increased market prices of replacement homes
Separate to this, 740 residential units will be intermediate affordable homes, the balance being for the open market financially beyond the reach of the average working Londoner. The Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea application area already has no provision of affordable rented accommodation, no keyworker, first time buyer, or homes for the elderly within the Registered Provider sector. In Hammersmith & Fulham there is no additional affordable social rented housing.
Increase in air pollution
The proposal will lead to further deterioration of existing poor air quality and is contrary to London Plan, Policy 7.14c which states that developments should be at least ‘air quality neutral’ and not lead to further deterioration of existing poor air quality.
The Junction of Cromwell/Warwick Road and Earls Court already breach legal limits on Particulates and Nitrogen Dioxide. The addition of 4,300 parking spaces will lead to further traffic movement and congestion and lead to further deterioration of local air quality.
The area cannot function without the completion of the entire site. There is the fear that the developers will build the high-end blocks in Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea and fail to complete the London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham part of the Opportunity Area, leaving the RBKC section landlocked, creating additional pressure on the Earl’s Court One-Way System with consequential increases in pollution.
Open and Green Space and children’s play areas
The provision of open and green space is inadequate and contrary to London Plan Policy 7.18. The proposals is also contrary to London Plan, Policy 3.6 with inadequate provision of children and young people’s play and informal recreation facilities.
Loss of education facilities and school provision
The scheme will destroy a special needs school on Gibbs Green and a younger children’s facility on Lillie Road. Despite the increase in population there is no additional Secondary School provision, given the shortage of school places for this age group in both boroughs. This is contrary to London Plan, Policy 3.18 on education facilities and ensuring there is an adequate provision of education facilities to meet the demands of a growing and changing population.
For the reasons set out above, I strongly urge you to direct refusal.
Darren Johnson AM
Green Party Member of the London Assembly
An update on recent developments [Council ‘whitewash over illegal deals’ in £8bn Earl’s Court scheme] on the West Ken & Gibbs Green Estate in the Standard:
A flagship Tory council is facing angry protests over the £8 billion redevelopment of Earl’s Court after deciding not to further investigate claims of wrongdoing.
However, we believe that this does not absolve the blame from Hammersmith & Fulham council.
More on the treatment of local residents at Dave Hill's London Blog
A flagship Tory council has decided there's no need to look deeper into claims of wrong doing made against it. But does the report it commissioned into the matter suggest otherwise?